How GIS transforms fiber proposals - Part 1: The cost of manual proposal methods

Ever wonder why some fiber providers consistently win contracts while others struggle to close deals? In a recent webinar, we pulled back the curtain on what's really happening in the proposal process. The (not so) shocking reality? Many providers are losing winnable deals due to slow, manual processes, poor visibility into their network assets, and proposals with cost estimates that miss the mark.

We're kicking off a three-part series based on our recent webinar Why fiber providers lose deals—and how to stop it. Throughout these posts, we'll examine the common challenges preventing fiber providers from winning deals and share practical solutions that are transforming the proposal process.

Challenge #1: Slow, manual processes

When it comes to fiber proposal creation, many telecom companies rely on outdated approaches that severely limit effectiveness. Most providers report needing several days to a week for proposal creation, with inconsistent timeframes.¹ Teams struggle not only with speed and accuracy but also with identifying which opportunities have the most potential.

Behind many lost deals lies an inefficient proposal process preventing providers from capitalizing on opportunities:

Inside the network: Splice sheets provide detailed connection information but lack spatial awareness. Circuit traces require multiple runs for comprehensive analysis and often exist separate from geographical context.

Outside the network: Non-telecom routing tools use problematic blanket cost-per-foot calculations that misrepresent actual deployment costs. Manual route design requires excessive resource investment on proposals that may never advance.

The real cost: These disconnected tools create collaboration gaps between teams and inconsistent workflows that waste resources. The biggest impact is on market timing—when every stage from network planning to permit acquisition moves at a glacial pace, providers miss revenue opportunities as competitors secure deals first.

The solution: GIS fiber management

Modern GIS platforms enable providers to set parameters, perform real-time analysis, and find optimal paths within their integrated networks. This brings several advantages to teams needing to get proposals out fast:

• Quick route analysis for multiple demand points simultaneously
• Ability to set customizable parameters like avoiding certain areas or using specific types of infrastructure
• Real-time splicing suggestions and circuit validation
• Visualization of business opportunities along potential routes

Geospatial data increases efficiency by providing "real-time information about permits, connectivity, construction, and more."² This means faster, more accurate proposals that reduce costly rework later in the project lifecycle.

The 2024 Fiber Deployment Annual Report reveals that regional cost variations can be significant, with Western states showing median underground costs up to 275% higher than other regions.³ Using GIS-based fiber management solutions, such as 3-GIS | Prospector, can give providers real-time visibility into these geographic cost factors during proposal creation, allowing for faster, more accurate regional pricing that helps win more deals.

Automated routing using 3-GIS | Prospector

Best practices for improving speed and efficiency

Implementing the right processes can reduce proposal creation time from weeks to days. As you work to streamline your proposal processes, consider these practical tips:

1. Invest strategically - Focus time and resources on proposals with the highest potential value, and consider future expansion opportunities
2. Develop repeatable processes - Create standardized workflows that deliver consistent results even with different team members
3. Enable real-time adjustments - Allow for dynamic user inputs that improve accuracy without sacrificing speed

The impact extends beyond just proposal creation. GIS-based solutions allow teams to digitize and automate key management workflows which reduce errors, boost productivity, and save money.⁴ This connectivity between office and field operations ensures greater proposal accuracy and faster implementation.

Remember: a fast process that produces inaccurate results won't win deals, and a precise-but-slow approach means missed opportunities. You need the right solution to help you achieve both speed and precision.

In our next post in the series, we'll explore how GIS systems enhance visibility into your existing infrastructure—helping you leverage available resources more effectively, reduce unnecessary builds, and create more competitive proposals. Stay tuned to discover how providers are turning their network data into a competitive advantage.

Citations: